Rock Coast Runners

The Mid Coast Running Club

Skip to content

NYTimes: When Training Backfires: Hard Work That’s Too Hard

For the Big dogs. People who are looking for advanced help, or want to give some advanced advice.

NYTimes: When Training Backfires: Hard Work That’s Too Hard

Postby Bonnie on Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:48 am

Here's an article from the New York Times I thought might be of interest:

When Training Backfires: Hard Work That’s Too Hard

By GINA KOLATA, 9/4/08

UNTIL last spring, running was going great for 15-year-old Erik Kraus. He had been training hard without a break for 18 months and was becoming faster and faster.

Then, when spring track started, something went awry. Every time he raced 1,500 meters, his time was 15 seconds slower than in the previous race.

Erik’s father, Dr. William Kraus, a runner himself and a cardiologist at Duke University who studies exercise, was concerned. Erik was tired all the time; his legs felt heavy; he was frustrated, irritable. Could it be the condition that athletes dread: overtraining?

Overtraining is the downside of training, the trap that can derail an athlete’s success. It’s a real physical condition caused by pushing too hard for too long. It can happen with too much exercise, too much intense exercise, or both. Its hallmarks are poor performances, exhaustion and apathy.

“You just feel bad,” said Dr. William O. Roberts, an internist at the University of Minnesota who specializes in treating athletes and is a former president of the American College of Sports Medicine. “The spark is gone.”

It can come on so insidiously that before athletes know it, they find themselves trapped in a downward spiral. The harder they train, the worse they do.

But there’s another trap — the overdiagnoses of overtraining, said Dr. Steven Keteyian, the director of preventive cardiology at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit.

Dr. Keteyian, who has written textbook chapters on the condition, cautions that it is quite rare. But many athletes worry about overtraining every time they fail to perform as well as they think they should.

“It doesn’t happen over a two-week period of time,” Dr. Keteyian said. And it is unlikely to strike someone running 20 miles or so a week or doing the equivalent amount of another endurance sport, he said.

“Twenty miles is nothing,” Dr. Keteyian said. “Talk to me when you are running 50 miles a week. If you are a runner and have a steady history of running 40 to 70 miles a week and now you are pushing it to 80, 90, 100 miles a week and your times are dropping and you are feeling sluggish, then I’ll start to listen.”

If overtraining has occurred, “it’s a long road back,” Dr. Keteyian said. The only cure is to take weeks or months off. No athlete wants that, Dr. Keteyian said, so it’s important not to jump to conclusions.

Dr. Kraus knew that overtraining was unlikely. But his son seemed to meet the criteria, such as they are. He began looking for credible data on overtraining but was soon disappointed to discover that overtraining remains poorly understood and understudied.

There is no definitive test for overtraining. Instead, the diagnosis is reached by exclusion. Besides slower times and fatigue, Dr. Keteyian and others say athletes may notice that their muscles are weaker and that their coordination is poorer. Their heart rates may be higher than they should be with moderate exercise. And their resting heart rates, taken first thing in the morning, can be higher, too.

Overtraining is an unintended consequence of the only known way for athletes to improve — by pushing their bodies and stressing themselves by deliberately going faster or longer than feels comfortable. “Training a little bit beyond your capabilities is the only way to get better,” Dr. Kraus said. “But you have to balance that with rest and recovery. It’s a fine line. Where is that edge and how do you get as close as possible without going over it?”

Elite athletes and their coaches are acutely aware of overtraining, said Frank Busch, the head coach for the University of Arizona’s swimming team and an assistant coach for the United States men’s Olympic swimming team. And they have become adept at heading it off.

Not too long ago, coaches thought that volume — hours upon hours of training — was the key to outstanding performances, Mr. Busch said. “The result was sort of an arms race among swimmers and other endurance athletes to see who could train the most,” he said. “Athletes began getting overtrained.”

Now coaches and swimmers know that there is a point of diminishing returns. Coaches look for signs that their athletes are doing too much. Performance is one indicator, of course, but so is something as simple as a swimmer who has stopped smiling, Mr. Busch said. “That’s usually a sign that they are dreading practice or there is something else going on. Maybe they are exhausted around the clock.”

Dr. Roberts said that among his recent overtrained patients was a young man who was a stellar Nordic skier. A year and a half later, in marched another: the man’s mother, a middle-aged woman, also a prize-winning Nordic skier.

“They both trained too hard,” Dr. Roberts said. Both, he added, “were more or less self-coached at the time.” No one was monitoring them.

“Athletes are obsessed and gullible,” Dr. Keteyian said. “They will do anything they can to improve their performance and they don’t know when to stop.”

Dr. Roberts suggested that athletes who feel tired all the time first take some time off from their sport, perhaps a few days to two weeks. If they still do not feel better, they should see their primary-care doctor and mention that they are concerned about overtraining. Or, he said, they might want to seek out a physician who specializes in sports medicine — a list is available on newamssm.org.

“An athlete would want to look for a physician who practices the broader scope of sports medicine and has not limited his or her practice to musculoskeletal problems,” Dr. Roberts added.

As for Dr. Kraus, he told his son to take a two-week break. That did not help. He had the youth tested for ferritin, an iron storage protein. Overtrained athletes can have low iron levels and anemia, although overtraining is not the only cause.

But even though Erik’s ferritin levels were sub par, and even though they rose slightly when he took iron supplements, he felt as tired and sluggish as ever. In the end, Erik Kraus ended up taking two months off. It was not easy. Like other athletes, he wanted to train, wanted to race, and he worried that he would never be competitive again. Now, finally, he has returned to running.

“When he first started back, he said, ‘Oh, my gosh, this feels good,’ ” Dr. Kraus recalled. Then Erik went for an eight-mile run with the fastest runner on his team. He not only kept up with his teammate but pushed him at the end.

Erik returned home from that run all smiles. “He said, ‘Dad, I had a breakthrough today,’ ” Dr. Kraus said.
Bonnie
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 8:49 am

Re: NYTimes: When Training Backfires: Hard Work That’s Too Hard

Postby Paula on Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:01 pm

Nice article.
Paula
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 12:17 pm

Re: NYTimes: When Training Backfires: Hard Work That’s Too Hard

Postby TrevorMills on Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:19 pm

I caught that article also. I was really surprised. The opinion of the expert (MD?) in the article was conflictory to what my assumed knowledge on the topic was. I was under the impression that overtraining was possible for any endurance athlete who does not take enough recovery time for a the bodies load tolerance. Meaning that if your body is on the rivet just running 20-30 miles a week, and you don't allow enough recovery, that you will run into the same scenario. I will have to check my sources, regarding the super high volumes only for overtraining. Maybe I need to invent the term "psuedo-overtraining" to describe what happens to us mere mortals.

Just out of curiosity, what are weekly mileage peaks for people? I've never gone above 31-32 and typically am in the 22-24 range when running is my main focus. I'm down to about one trail run a week right now and riding mountain bike 6-8hrs a week. Middle of October, I will get back to running more seriously.
TrevorMills
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:59 pm

Re: NYTimes: When Training Backfires: Hard Work That’s Too Hard

Postby Paula on Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:49 pm

I see a lot of people who run in the 70 - 80 mile range, though I can't personally imagine it. Last week I did 40, but I keep my daily runs in the 5 - 7 mile range, a 3 miler on Saturday and then a longer day on Sunday and while I gradually increase that, if the body doesn't feel up to it, I call it a day and go do another activity. All this is when I'm training for a marathon. Other than that, I just run the distance I have time for. I think just getting out moving will keep you in running form, though from what I've read, it's good to get at least one speed type of run in a week if you can. I think the overtraining can mean overlife as well. I know that while I don't put in a lot of miles a day, I put in a lot of activity a day. I run before work, then stand on my legs 8-12 hours, then come home and bike, lift, paddle and fall asleep to do it all over the next day. I think a lot of people live such a busy life, that they just don't get the everyday recovery they need, not just from an athletic standpoint.
Paula
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 12:17 pm

Re: NYTimes: When Training Backfires: Hard Work That’s Too Hard

Postby vern on Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:33 am

Trevor,

Interesting article. I'm by no means an authority, but my views are similar to yours. I've always thought you could "overtrain" running 40 miles per week as well as those running 80 mpw.

As for peak levels, I've never been a high milage guy. When training for my early marathons, I held a 10 week level of 44-48 mpw prior to the taper. Only once or twice have I ever exceeded 50 mpw.

Generally, I've been a 20-40 mpw runner and I firmly believe in training "cycles". For instance, if I'm focusing on a particular time for a 10k, I'll train hard for 8-10 weeks and then following the race, substancially reduce milage and especially intensity for 2-3 weeks. For the mary, the recovery might be twice that. Also, I've never hesitated to take an extra day off if I felt it was needed. For me personally, the mental strain of "having to get out there everyday" was as taxing as the physical workload.

Geez, the kid in the article, 18 months of "hard" training without a break! That's a whole level I can't even imagine!
vern
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 5:42 pm

Re: NYTimes: When Training Backfires: Hard Work That’s Too Hard

Postby JSprague on Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:12 pm

Interesting article, but I guess I'll give you a different opinion.

I think "overtraining" is perhaps a bit over-diagnosed. All through college I trained at a maximum of 50 miles a week, never going above that. If I felt my body becoming worn down I would get scared and back off. Once I graduated it didn't matter as much if I overtrained and had to take time off so I decided to start pushing the limits. When I hit those periods of feeling worn down instead of backing off I just pushed through and sure enough my body adjusted and I was able to train even more. I now run anywhere between 70 and 90 miles a week and spend Monday through Friday chasing down K-5 Elementary kids in Physical Education class, so I have a pretty busy week. I've now since completely shattered all PR's that I had from High School and College all from taking a chance and pushing through the "tired, worn down feeling" that use to scare me and make me back off.

I guess from my opinion, you can wear yourself down with any amount of volume but these feelings can easily be remedied with a few easy days off. The actual "overtraining" described in this article that involves physiological changes and requires prolonged time off may be reserved for those that take the healthy obsession we all share to unhealthy levels.
JSprague
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:56 pm

Re: NYTimes: When Training Backfires: Hard Work That’s Too Hard

Postby mary smith on Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:05 pm

i just found and read bonnie's article, and i think it was fabulous, and informative on both ends of the spectrum. i know for me, like vern, and others, i can only run 30-35 miles a week, and i am definitely teetering on over training. now my daughter on the other hand, runs 60+ miles a week, and has been doing so with at least 1 race a month for at least 2+ years, without trouble, or concern. and she seems to get faster and faster. i think its the ole, "everybody is different, and can sustain different amounts of training" either way, GREAT ARTICLE!!!
mary smith
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:10 am


Return to Elites

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


cron